Nitpickers.com : Movie Nitpick - Back to the Future Part II - 1989 - Post and Review nitpicks on your favorite Movies.

Submit Nitpick : Movie TV |
Join Nitpickers
Login

Poll

What do you use the Internet for most?

Email : 26.94%

Web Surfing : 53.87%

Education : 7.75%

Chating : 11.44%

Discuss movie mistakes and the Nitpickers website with other members at our:

Movie Forum!

Associated Websites

Movie Quotes
Nitpickers Forum

No Votes

3 Comments

Nitpick Description

Submitted by Nitpicker :	877
Movie :	Back to the Future Part II - 1989
Nitpick Category :	Other
Nitpick Number :	2382
Approximate time of Nitpick :	right at the end
Summary :	Magical Almanac cover (Refuted)
Detail :	\n \n Biff uses the Almanac's cover to cover his OOH LA LA in which case it is taken to the head master's office and subsequently discarded after Marty realises that it's the OHH LA LA. Yet towards the end of the movie when Marty burns the Almanac surprise surprise the cover has magically appeared on it...

Comments


Dust jacket No Votes by 5471 Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:29 PM If you remember from the shop, the book had a dust jacket. This was what Biff used to cover his magazine and would have been identical to the actual front cover of the Almanac. The Almanac would still have had it's original paper cover on.
It's a damn dust cover No Votes by 6009 Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:29 PM The book has a dust cover, hence, the cover of the book is the paper back which is underneath the dust cover which is identical to the dust cover jacket.
Did anyone read the original nitpick? No Votes by blueblue Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:29 PM Why was this nitpick refuted? None of the comments even have anything to do with it! The nitter is not saying that the dust jacket never existed, s/he's saying that it was thrown away and later reappears on the book when Marty burns it. \r \rI quote:\rit is taken to the head master's office and subsequently discarded\r. . . \rtowards the end of the movie when Marty burns the Almanac. . . the cover has magically appeared on it\r \rIt is unfortunate that this will only be reinstated if the original nitter asks for an appeal, because it's a perfectly reasonable nitpick.